<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Vista vs. Windows XP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.joysystems.com/2009/07/windows-vista-vs-windows-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.joysystems.com/2009/07/windows-vista-vs-windows-xp/</link>
	<description>For the Best Refurbished Computers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 08:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: T3ch9uru</title>
		<link>http://blog.joysystems.com/2009/07/windows-vista-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>T3ch9uru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joysystems.com/?p=1127#comment-99</guid>
		<description>yea i can't stand the performance drops. XP is still the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea i can&#8217;t stand the performance drops. XP is still the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean6779</title>
		<link>http://blog.joysystems.com/2009/07/windows-vista-vs-windows-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>sean6779</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.joysystems.com/?p=1127#comment-91</guid>
		<description>After checking the new OS I have to say that MS put a lot of effort on the interface and some few things. It really looks nice. But after long consideration I have reach to the conclusion that why should I change to this new OS. There are no great new improvements. The web pages still look the same. My programs run the same way. And finally if you put them side by side (same hardware) XP is by far the winner, faster and still (more or less) reliable. So why to spend more money in better hardware just to get the same performance that I have with XP today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After checking the new OS I have to say that MS put a lot of effort on the interface and some few things. It really looks nice. But after long consideration I have reach to the conclusion that why should I change to this new OS. There are no great new improvements. The web pages still look the same. My programs run the same way. And finally if you put them side by side (same hardware) XP is by far the winner, faster and still (more or less) reliable. So why to spend more money in better hardware just to get the same performance that I have with XP today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

